Toma de decisiones del profesorado al enseñar estadística y probabilidad

Autores

  • Teresa Carrasco Servicio Local de Educación Pública Andalién Sur
  • Eugenio Chandia Universidad de Concepción https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2489-1226
  • Claudia Vásquez Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28998/2175-6600.2024v16n38pe15810

Palavras-chave:

Prácticas de Instrucción, Toma de decisión, Probabilidad

Resumo

En este estudio se analizan las Prácticas de Instrucción (PI) de un docente chileno que realiza clases de estadística y probabilidad en tercer año medio (entre 15 y 17 años). Para ello, se utiliza el enfoque de estudio de caso, ya que se analiza la particularidad de un docente bajo una metodología cualitativa de enfoque interpretativo. La primera etapa consiste en grabar todas las clases de la unidad, para posteriormente seleccionar 9 video viñetas con una duración de entre 0:22 y 1:50 minutos enmarcados en los esquemas de interacción de las PI. Se aplicó una entrevista semi-estructurada, para su análisis se utilizaron las transcripciones usando la perspectiva de la Teoría Fundamentada, desarrollando codificación abierta, axial y selectiva. Los principales resultados logran evidenciar las etapas por la que el docente pasa para llegar a tomar una decisión y como cada una de esas características se transforma en una PI como interacción entre el profesor, estudiante y contenido, siendo también alguno de ellos enlace para las PI posibles. Sin embargo, para relacionar la interpretación y la decisión, el profesor alude a su campo profesional que se limita a la experiencia del profesor estableciendo familias de acciones.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Amador, J., & Lamberg, T. (2013). Learning Trajectories, Lesson Planning, Affordances, and Constraints in the Design and Enactment of Mathematics Teaching. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 15(2), 146–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2013.770719

American Statistical Association. (2016). Guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education: College report. Report. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20140325-01

Anderson, L. (2003). Classroom assessment: Enhancing the quality of teacher decision making.

Ball, D. L. (2001). Teaching, With Respect to Mathematics and Students. In Beyond Classical Pedagogy: Teaching Elementary School Mathematics (pp. 11–22).

Batanero, C., Burrill, G., & Reading, C. (2015). Teaching Statistics in School Mathematics Challenges for Teaching and Teacher Education. Statewide Agricultural Land Use Baseline 2015 (Vol. 1). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., … Tsai, Y.-M. (2010). Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge, Cognitive Activation in the Classroom, and Student Progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133–180. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209345157

Blömeke, S., Busse, A., Kaiser, G., König, J., & Suhl, U. (2016). The relation between content-specific and general teacher knowledge and skills. Teaching and Teacher Education, 56, 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.02.003

Blömeke, S., & Delaney, S. (2012). Assessment of teacher knowledge across countries: A review of the state of research, 44, 223–247.

Blömeke, S., Gustafsson, J. E., & Shavelson, R. J. (2015). Beyond dichotomies: Competence viewed as a continuum. Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 223(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000194

Blömeke, S., Hoth, J., Döhrmann, M., Busse, A., Kaiser, G., & König, J. (2015). Teacher Change During Induction: Development of Beginning Primary Teachers’ Knowledge, Beliefs and Performance. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2), 287–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9619-4

Boston, M., Bostic, J., Lesseig, K., & Sherman, M. (2015). A comparison of mathematics classroom observation protocols. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 3(2), 154–170. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteaceduc.3.2.0154

Cai, J., Middleton, J. A., Schack, E. O., & Fisher, M. H. (2017). Research in Mathematics Education Teacher Noticing : Bridging and Broadening Perspectives , Contexts , and Frameworks.

Chapman, O. (2008). The challenge of mathematics teacher education in an era of mathematics education reform. In The international handbook of mathematics teacher education (pp. 115–134).

Charalambous, C. Y., & Hill, H. C. (2012). Teacher knowledge, curriculum materials, and quality of instruction: Unpacking a complex relationship. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(4), 443–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2011.650215

Clough, M. P., Berg, C. A., & Olson, J. K. (2009). Promoting effective science teacher education and science teaching: A framework for teacher decision-making. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(4), 821–847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-008-9146-7

Cohen, D. K., Raudenbush, S. W., & Ball, D. L. (2003). Resources , Instruction , and Research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(2), 119–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0438-6

Copur-Gencturk, Y. (2015). The Effects of Changes in Mathematical Knowledge on Teaching: A Longitudinal Study of Teachers’ Knowledge and Instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(3), 280–330. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.46.3.0280

Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher Quality and Student Achievement : A Review of State Policy Evidence Previous Research. Education, 8(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.clp

Darling-Hammond, L., Chung Wei, R., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional Learning in the Learning Profession: A Status Report on Teacher Development in the United States and Abroad.

Dehoney, J. (1995). Cognitive Task Analysis: Implications for the Theory and Practice of Instructional Design. Annual National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology.

Dieterle, S., Guarino, C. M., Bargagliotti, A. E., & Mason, W. M. (2013). What Can We Learn About Effective Mathematics Teaching? Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 6(2), 164–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2012.706695

Dunekacke, S., Jenßen, L., Eilerts, K., & Blömeke, S. (2016). Epistemological beliefs of prospective preschool teachers and their relation to knowledge, perception, and planning abilities in the field of mathematics: a process model. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 48(1–2), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0711-6

Eichler, A., & Zapata-Cardona, L. (2016). Empirical Research in Statistics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38968-4

Estrella, S. (2017). Enseñar estadística para alfabetizar estadísticamente y desarrollar el razonamiento estadístico. Alternativas Pedagógicas Para La Educación Matemática Del Siglo XXI, 173–194.

Gallagher, H. A. (2016). Professional Development To Support Instructional Improvement : Lessons from Research, 1–9.

Garfield, J., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2008). Research on Teaching and Learning Statistics. Developing Students’ Statistical Reasoning, 21–45.

Gonzalez, O. (2016). A Framework for Assessing Statistical Knowledge for Teaching Based on the Identifi cation of Conceptions of Variability Held by Teachers. In D. Ben-Zvi & K. Makar (Eds.), Teaching and Learning of Statistics (pp. 315–326). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12688-3

Gonzalez, O. (2017). Secondary School Mathematics Teachers’ Conceptions on Data-Based Decision-Making: Insights from Four Japanese Cases. Teaching and Learning in Maths Classrooms, 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49232-2

Jon, R., Lynch, K., Perova, N., Jacobs, V. R., Philipp, R. A., York, N., & Link, C. (2013). Using video to improve mathematics ’ teachers ’ abilities to attend to classroom features : A replication study The Harvard community has made this article openly available . Please share how this access benefits you . Your story matters . Citation Access.

Kaiser, G., Blömeke, S., König, J., Busse, A., Döhrmann, M., Hoth, J., & Kaiser, G. (2017). Professional competencies of ( prospective ) mathematics teachers — cognitive versus situated approaches. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 161–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9713-8

Klein, G., & Hoffman, R. (1992). Seeing the invisible: Perceptual-cognitive aspects of expertise. Cognitive Science Foundations of Instruction. Retrieved from http://cmapsinternal.ihmc.us/rid=1217527241618_235135118_3994/Seeing the Invisible-1992.pdf

König, J. (2015). Measuring classroom management expertise (CME) of teachers: A video-based assessment approach and statistical results. Cogent Education, 2(1), 991178. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2014.991178

König, J., Blömeke, S., & Kaiser, G. (2015). Early Career Mathematics Teachers’ General Pedagogical Knowledge and Skills: Do Teacher Education, Teaching Experience, and Working Conditions Make a Difference? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2), 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9618-5

Lembke, E. S., Hampton, D., & Beyers, S. J. (2012). RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION INMATHEMATICS: CRITICAL ELEMENTS. Revista de Educacion, 49(3), 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits

Mason, J. (2016). Perception, interpretation and decision making: understanding gaps between competence and performance—a commentary. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 48(1–2), 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0764-1

Munter, C. (2014). Developing Visions of High-Quality Mathematics Instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education (Vol. 45). https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.45.5.0584

Ottmar, E. R., Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., Larsen, R. A., & Berry, R. Q. (2015). Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching, Standards-Based Mathematics Teaching Practices, and Student Achievement in the Context of the Responsive Classroom Approach. American Educational Research Journal, 52(4), 787–821. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831215579484

Rasmussen, J. (2014). Teacher expertise. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 15459–15465.

Sabers, D. S., Cushing, K. S., & Berliner, D. C. (2017). Differences among Teachers in a Task Characterized by Simultaneity , Multidimensionality , and Immediacy, 28(1), 63–88.

Santagata, R., & Yeh, C. (2016). The role of perception, interpretation, and decision making in the development of beginning teachers’ competence. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 48(1–2), 153–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0737-9

Sherin, M. G., Jacobs, V. R., & Philipp, R. A. (2011). Teacher Noticing Seeing Trouugh Teachers’ Eyes.

Simons, H. (2011). El estudio de caso: Teoría y práctica. Madrid. Retrieved from http://books.google.es/books/about/Bases_de_la_investigaci?n_cualitativa.html?id=TmgvTb4tiR8C&pgis=1

Stahnke, R., Schueler, S., & Roesken-Winter, B. (2016). Teachers’ perception, interpretation, and decision-making: a systematic review of empirical mathematics education research. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 48(1–2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0775-y

Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Margaret, S., & Hughes, E. K. (2013). Orchestrating Productive Mathematical Discussions : Five Practices for Helping Teachers Move Beyond Show and Tell. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, (September), 313–340.

Stein, M. K., & Smith, M. S. (2011). 5 practices for Orchestrating productive mathematics discussions.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2002). Bases de la investigación cualitativa: técnicas y procedimientos para desarrollar la teoría fundamentada. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153

Taylor, S., & Bogdan, R. (1998). Introducción a los métodos cualitativos en investigación. Introducción a Los Métodos Cualitativos de Investigación, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Teppo, A. (2015). Grounded theory methods. In Approaches to qualitative research in mathematics education: examples of methodology and methods (pp. 3–21). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2015.1092392

Van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2002). Learning to Notice: Scaffolding New Teachers’ Interpretations of Classroom Interactions LEARNING TO NOTICE IN THE CONTEXT OF REFORM. Jl. of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(4), 571–596.

Van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2008). Mathematics teachers’ “learning to notice” in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 244–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TATE.2006.11.005

Vollstedt, M. (2015). To see the wood for the trees: The development of theory from empirical interview data using grounded theory. Approaches to Qualitative Research in Mathematics Education, 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9181-6

Wilson, P. H., Sztajn, P., Edgington, C., & Myers, M. (2015). Teachers’ Uses of a Learning Trajectory in Student-Centered Instructional Practices. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(3), 227–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487115574104

Publicado

2024-01-22

Como Citar

CARRASCO, Teresa; CHANDIA, Eugenio; VÁSQUEZ, Claudia. Toma de decisiones del profesorado al enseñar estadística y probabilidad. Debates em Educação, [S. l.], v. 16, n. 38, p. e15810, 2024. DOI: 10.28998/2175-6600.2024v16n38pe15810. Disponível em: https://www.seer.ufal.br/index.php/debateseducacao/article/view/15810. Acesso em: 1 dez. 2024.

Edição

Seção

Dossiê: Formação de professores que ensinam Matemática: contextos e práticas

Artigos Semelhantes

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

Você também pode iniciar uma pesquisa avançada por similaridade para este artigo.